Please read the below newspaper clipping it was looks good but the subject is different to original.

First.

In that some are requested government "don't make any termination please allow all the employs to do service". But in that statement some words are not accurate they saying that "in the year of 2003 as per the court orders 2324 posts are filled" are it possible to fill 100% posts in recruitment?  What about the handicapped and ST allotted seats. And one more thing is as per high court final judgment (59. By virtue of the aforesaid Order, all the Government trainees with Intermediate and the private institutions candidates with Intermediate have been appointed subject to the final result. It is to be noted that interlocutory orders pending disposal of writ petitions do not survive after the disposal of the main writ petitions.) These appointments are up to final judgment of the High court only.  

At the same time this counseling must be done as per schedule same was in the G.O.Ms.No.159.HMFW (J2) Dept. Dt: 16.05.2003, wide Para no 4 "there is no need to pass interim order prayed by the petitioners in this application in view of the submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General that no formal orders of appointment as such shall be issued to any of the candidates. However, the counseling as per the schedule shall go on and the same shall be subject to further orders to be passed by this court" and as per Para 7(e) “The Selection shall be made as per rules in the force including rule of reservation”.

Here me like tell some facts to the editor.

1. 1.  The actual posts filled by the government are not 2324.
2. 2.  It is not possible fill the 100% vacancies in a particular recruitment.
3. 3.  The court and The Government repeatedly saying about made the counseling as per schedule i.e. The Selection shall be made as per rules in the force including rule of reservation it is not maintained at the time of posts filling.
4. 4.  What about the handicapped and ST candidates is 100% candidates available for appointment or selecting officer converted that posts?

Second.

They are saying that in the year of 2006 nearly 1700 extra posts are filled by the government. It is not correct, these are the candidates who passed and qualified in the 2002 recruitment and kept in sealed cover at the time of Honorable High Court hearings Writ Petition No. 422 of 2003, W.P. No. 15107 of 2002 and G.O. Ms. No. 16, H.M & FW (J2) Department, dated 3.2.2003 (7. Against the said order, the Writ Petition No. 15107 of 2002 was filed by the applicants in the O.A. No. 6856 of 2002. The Writ Petition No. 15107 of 2002 filed only challenging one of the directions of the tribunal wherein it was held that there was no illegality in the notification prescribing the S.S.C. as minimum qualification instead of Intermediate in view of G.O. Ms. No. 111, dated 12.4.2002, but by the time of recruitment, necessary statutory amendment shall be made as submitted by the learned Government Pleader. In the said writ petition, number of persons who passed the Training Course from the private institutions either with S.S.C. or Intermediate qualification were impleaded as party respondents. In the meanwhile, the test was conducted on 11.8.2002 and results were declared on 12.8.2002 and Counselling was commenced for verification of qualifications. At that point of time, the Government issued G.O. Ms. No. 484, dated 24.12.2002 cancelling the entire selection process. Against the said cancellation, the Writ Petition No. 422 of 2003 was filed before this Court by some of the candidates, who were in the selection panel and the learned Single Judge of this Court on 7.1.2003 passed interim Orders to the effect that the selection process may go on and the results of the candidates of private institutions may be kept in sealed cover. Consequently, the Government issued order in G.O. Ms. No. 16, dated 3.2.2003 in conformity with the interim Order of the learned Single Judge. But, even prior to the interim order of the learned Single Judge, the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. No. 15107 of 2002 filed against the orders in O.A. No. 6856 of 2002, granted stay of selections. But, however, the Division Bench later while directing Writ Petition 422 of 2003 and 15107 of 2002 to be disposed of jointly ordered that the selections should go on and passed interim orders that the Government candidates with Intermediate should be filled and thereafter all the private candidates with Intermediate may be filled up subject to final Orders. During the interregnum, the four institutions from which the candidates obtained Diploma certificates were issued with show- cause notice of cancellation of the recognition). At the time of final judgment Honorable High Court give his judgment in favor of Selected Candidates.
  

But against the High Court order an SLP was filed by the effected parties (Non Selected Candidates) and obtained interim orders on 06.02.2004 to continue in service the service since than the matter was ceased by the Hon’ble Supreme Court at that no further appointments were made with candidate those who are in the sealed cover. Later in the year 2006 the government of A.P., filed an I.A and sought permission to fill up the posts of M.P.H.A (M) accordingly permission was granted by order dt. 07.08.2006 at that time the appointments was made with selected candidates (Sealed cover candidates) with G.O.Rt.No.1234.HMFW(J2) Dept. Dt;15.09.2006 with this G.O govt permitted to fill up the vacancies with merit in the existing vacancies counting as on 15.09.2006. The vacancies are existing but not selected candidates.  

1. 1.  As per the above Para who are the existing?
2. 2.  Is 2006 appointments are existing appointments?